Civil litigation is an essential aspect of the legal system in Mississauga, handling a range of disputes from contractual issues to property disagreements. Navigating these legal waters can be challenging, but with the right guidance, individuals and businesses can effectively manage their civil cases. This is where the expertise of a civil litigation lawyer becomes… Continue reading What You Need to Know about Civil Litigation Matters in Mississauga
A litigation attorney represents either defendants or plaintiffs in civil cases. Litigation attorneys can also be referred to as trial lawyers or a litigator. A litigation attorney usually specializes in a specific area, such as divorce law or medical malpractice suits. Specialization will give litigation attorneys more detailed knowledge in the specific area. Away from… Continue reading Why Do You Need A Civil Litigation Attorney
Civil trial litigators engage in a wide range of practice areas, from corporate law to tax law, intellectual property, and securities law. For civil litigation, an attorney should be able to handle all of the critical issues involved in your case, whether you’re the plaintiff or the defendant. Choosing the finest civil trial litigator is… Continue reading Are you looking for the best civil litigation trial court lawyer?
Practice – Interlocutory motions to stay implementation of regulations pending final decision on appeals and to delay implementation if appeals dismissed – Leave to appeal granted shortly after applications to stay heard – Whether the applications for relief from compliance with regulations should be granted – Tobacco Products Control Act, S.C. 1988, c. 20, ss.… Continue reading RJR – MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311
Practice Motion to strike Action brought by person suffering from disease allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos fibres Allegation of conspiracy to withhold information of potential health risks Allegations of other nominate torts Circumstances in which a statement of claim (or portions of it) could be struck out Whether allegations based on the tort of… Continue reading Hunt v. Carey Canada Inc., [1990] 2 S.C.R. 959
Civil procedure — Third party claims — Motion to strike — Tobacco manufacturers being sued by provincial government to recover health care costs of tobacco related illnesses, and by consumers of “light” or “mild” cigarettes for damages and punitive damages — Tobacco companies issuing third party notices to federal government claiming contribution and indemnity —… Continue reading R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45
[1] In my Reasons for Decision dated May 27, 2010 in DUCA Financial Services Credit Union Ltd. v. Bozzo, 2010 ONSC 3104, I dismissed the claim of the plaintiff (“Duca”) that a January 29, 1988 trust declaration executed by the defendant Albert Bozzo was a sham and void or alternatively, was void because of the… Continue reading DUCA Financial Services Credit Union Ltd. v. Bozzo, 2010 ONSC 4601 (CanLII)
In June 2001, two representatives of a group of American investors met with H and others to discuss an investment opportunity. The group wired US$1.2 million, which was pooled with other funds and transferred to H’s company, Tropos. A few months later, Tropos forwarded more than US$10 million to an offshore bank and the money… Continue reading Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7 (CanLII), [2014] 1 SCR 87
P was retained by the defendant law firm through P’s company, the plaintiff, to provide an expert opinion in a class proceeding. When the defendant failed to pay the account, the plaintiff brought an action for damages in the amount of the account (plus accrued interest under the contract), plus HST, and for prejudgment interest… Continue reading Puri Consulting Ltd. v. Kim Orr Barristers PC, 2015 ONCA 727
The plaintiff claimed that the defendant deceived him into having recreational sexual intercourse which, contrary to his wishes, resulted in the birth of a child. He sued the defendant for negligent misrepresentation, seeking $4 million in damages for non-pathological emotional harm caused by unplanned parenthood. The defendant brought a motion to strike the statement of… Continue reading P. (P.) v. D. (D.), 2016 ONSC 258
© 2024 Hashmi Law Group || Sitemap
